ALE Affordability Considerations and Updates for 2023

Quick Facts

• Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) applicable large employers (ALEs) must offer coverage that is minimum value and affordable to full-time employees and their dependent children.
• The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) updates the affordability percentage annually.
• In 2023 the affordability percentage will decrease to 9.12%.
• The IRS provides three affordability “safe harbors” to help employers comply with the affordability requirement.

Background

For purposes of individual eligibility for tax subsidies through a public Exchange, and for compliance with the employer shared responsibility rules under §4980H, it is important to understand whether coverage offered under an employer-sponsored group health plan is “affordable.” When setting plan contribution rates, employers must consider IRS employer affordability safe harbors, the various elements that play into the determination of the employee contribution, and the penalties associated with failing to offer affordable coverage. 

Applicable large employers (ALEs) – those with 50 or more full-time equivalents (FTEs) – are required to comply with the employer shared responsibility rules under §4980H (also known as the “employer mandate”). To avoid potential penalties, employers are required to offer minimum value, affordable coverage to full-time employees and their dependent children. In addition, individuals who are offered (or eligible for) minimum value, affordable coverage under an employer-sponsored group health plan are not eligible for a tax subsidy when purchasing individual health insurance through a public Exchange.

• Coverage is generally considered “affordable” if the employee contribution for employee-only (single) coverage does not exceed a set percentage (9.12% in 2023) of household income. Coverage is considered affordable for dependents as well, regardless of the contribution amount, so long as the employee-only (single) coverage is affordable.
• Coverage is also considered “affordable” for purposes of satisfying §4980H(b) requirements so long as the employee contribution satisfies at least one of three available safe harbors: federal poverty level (FPL), rate of pay, or Form W-2.

Required Contribution Percentage

Originally, for 2014, the required contribution percentage for determining affordability was set at 9.5%. The percentage is adjusted annually. See applicable percentages for each year in the table below.

Plan Year	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022	2023
Affordability Percentage	9.56%	9.66%	9.69%	9.56%	9.86%	9.78%	9.83%	9.61%	9.12%

The affordability percentage adjustments apply for “plan years beginning in…,” and therefore an employer with a non-calendar year must apply the percentage for the year in which the plan year begins. For example, an employer with a medical plan year of July – June would use 9.61% for the plan year beginning in July 2022 and 9.12% for the plan year beginning July 2023.

Federal Poverty Level (FPL) Safe Harbor

“Federal Poverty Line” refers to any of the poverty guidelines (updated periodically in the Federal Register by the Secretary of Health and Human Services) in effect within six months before the first day of the plan year of the applicable large employer member’s health plan. The FPL is typically updated in late January, and therefore a calendar year plan will rely upon the FPL of the previous year, while plans beginning in February or later can rely upon the current year’s FPL.

Coverage offered to an employee is affordable if the employee’s cost for single coverage does not exceed 9.12% (in 2023) of the FPL for a single individual (i.e., $103.28/month for calendar year plan years in 2023).

When determining which affordability safe harbor to use, employers should first consider the FPL safe harbor because it is the simplest and guarantees affordability for all employees. If the monthly employee contribution for single coverage does not meet the FPL safe harbor, then the employer should consider the rate of pay or Form W-2 safe harbor.

Rate of Pay Safe Harbor

For an hourly employee, the employee’s monthly contribution for single coverage is affordable if it does not exceed 9.12% (in 2023) of the employee’s hourly rate multiplied by 130.

• The calculation uses the employee’s rate of pay as of the first day of the coverage period, unless the rate of pay is reduced, in which case the lower amount is used.
• 130 is used in the calculation even if the employee works more or less than 130 hours during a calendar month to match the full-time definition. Therefore, this safe harbor protects the employer even in situations in which the employee’s hours may be less than full-time and the employer remains obligated to continue offering coverage during the stability period. However, it might also require a lower monthly employee contribution than required under the Form W-2 safe harbor for employees who regularly work 40 or more hours per week.

For a non-hourly employee, the coverage is treated as affordable if the employee’s required contribution for single coverage does not exceed 9.12% (in 2023) of the employee’s monthly salary as of the first day of the coverage period (instead of 130 multiplied by the hourly rate of pay)—provided that if the monthly salary is reduced, including due to a reduction in work hours, this safe harbor is not available.

NOTE: This safe harbor cannot be used for tipped employees or for employees who are compensated solely based on commissions.

EXAMPLE – Employer has full-time hourly employees paid $14/hour and up. So long as employee contributions for the lowest cost minimum value plan do not exceed $165.98/month (130 x $14 x 9.12% in 2023), the coverage will be considered affordable.

Form W-2 Safe Harbor

Under this safe harbor, the employee’s annual contribution for single coverage is affordable if it is less than 9.12% (in 2023) of the employee’s Form W-2 Box 1 wages. Application of this safe harbor is determined after the end of the calendar year, taking into account the employee’s annual W-2 wages (as reported in Box 1) and the employee contribution for the full calendar year (e.g., employee’s 2023 Box 1 wages and employee contributions during 2023).

To use this method, an employee’s required contribution must remain a consistent amount or a consistent percentage of all Form W-2 wages during the year. When using this method in advance of the plan year to set employer contributions, the employer would have to base affordability on an estimate of Box 1 wages for the year. Box 1 is used to report taxable wages, bonuses, tips, and other compensation paid by the employer, as defined in Code §3401(a). It does not include non-taxable employee benefits, such as pre-tax contributions to a 401(k) plan or pre-tax cafeteria plan salary reductions. 

EXAMPLE 1 – Employee is full-time January through December and is offered minimum value coverage that costs the employee $200/month for single coverage ($2,400 for the year). This coverage will be affordable for any employees that have Box 1 W-2 wages of $26,315.80 or more ($2,400 / 9.12% in 2023).

EXAMPLE 2 – Employer expects that all full-time employees will have at least $30,000 or more reported in Box 1 during the year. So long as the employee contributions for single coverage do not exceed $2,736 for the year or $228/month ($30,000 x 9.12% in 2023), the coverage will be affordable for those considered full-time all 12 months.

Affordable and Not Affordable at the Same Time!

Subsidy eligibility for coverage through a public Exchange will always be based on household income. That being the case, if an individual qualifies for a tax subsidy because the employee contribution is deemed unaffordable using household income, but the employer can show that the coverage is affordable using one of the three safe harbor methods mentioned above, the employer will not be liable for a penalty under §4980H(b).

EXAMPLE – Employer determines that the lowest rate of pay for hourly employees is $12/hour. Using the rate of pay safe harbor, the employer decides to set employee contributions for single coverage at $142.00 (130 hours x $12/hour x 9.12% = $142.27). One of the employer’s full-time employees earns about $1,800/month, but also makes a $300/month alimony payment. Household income for subsidy purposes is based on an individual’s household adjusted gross income (AGI), and alimony payments are an “above the line” deduction that reduces an individual’s AGI. Consequently, this individual’s monthly household income equals $1,500, and the employee’s required contribution for single coverage ($142.00) equals 9.46% of household income. This employee might qualify for a subsidy when purchasing individual health insurance through a public Exchange, but the employer would face no liability under §4980H(b) due to meeting the rate of pay safe harbor.

Determining Employee Contributions

The employee contribution considers the amount an employee is required to contribute toward single coverage under the lowest cost minimum value coverage offered by the employer. In addition to the amount the employee is required to contribute toward the monthly premium, several other things may impact the employee contribution reported on Line 15 of Form 1095-C for purposes of the affordability calculation as set forth below.

Health Savings Accounts

Contributions to an HSA, which are not available to pay for the insurance premium, do not affect affordability.

Health Reimbursement Arrangements

Contributions to an HRA are typically not available to reimburse the premium (they are more often designed to offset plan cost-sharing), and so employer contributions may count toward determining minimum value, but do not impact the employee contribution for purposes of determining affordability.

Flex Credits

Flex credits (or defined contributions) restricted to health coverage (e.g., medical, dental, vision, or health flexible spending account (FSA)) will decrease the employee contribution. However, flex credits that can be used for non-health coverage do not decrease the employee contribution.

EXAMPLE- if the employer makes $300/month available via flex credits and the employee’s cost for single medical coverage is $500/month. If the flex credit may be used only toward the medical, dental or vision premiums, or contributed to a health FSA, the monthly employee contribution for affordability purposes is $200 ($500 – $300). However, if in addition to the options mentioned above, the employee may use the $300 toward life, disability, a dependent care assistance program (DCAP) or taken as cash, the monthly employee contribution for affordability purposes is $500.

Opt-Out Credits and Incentives

If the employee has the option to either receive medical coverage or receive an amount as taxable cash (an opt-out or waiver incentive), this cash option may need to be considered for purposes of affordability. If the credit is available to any employee who waives coverage (i.e., an unconditional opt-out), the opt-out incentive should be used in calculating affordability for all eligible employees. If the opt-out credit is limited only to employees who show proof of other non-individual health insurance and who also attest to all family members having minimum essential coverage (i.e., an “eligible opt-out arrangement”), then the credit would not be considered for any employees, whether they enroll in the employer’s plan or receive the opt-out credit.

EXAMPLE – If the employee cost for health coverage is $125/month, but there is an opt-out credit of $50/month for any employee who waives coverage, the employee contribution for affordability purposes is $175 ($125 + $50). There is transition relief allowing employers to disregard the opt-out amount for opt-out arrangements in place prior to December 2015 and not substantially changed since that time. If the employee cost for health coverage is $125/month, but there is an opt-out credit of $50/month for any of those employees who provide coverage for themselves and family members under another employer’s group health plan (e.g., through a spouse), the employee contribution for affordability purposes is $125.

Wellness Incentives

Affordability is determined assuming the individual fails to satisfy any wellness requirements, UNLESS it is tobacco-related.

EXAMPLE – If the required employee contribution for the month is $200 and the potential wellness incentive (not tobacco-related) reduces the cost to $150; coverage is “affordable” so long as $200 (not $150) does not exceed 9.12% (in 2023) of the employee’s household income. If the required employee contribution for the month is $200 and the potential wellness incentive (tobacco-related) reduces the cost to $130; coverage is “affordable” so long as $130 (not $200) does not exceed 9.12% (in 2023) of the employee’s household income.

Setting Employer Contributions

It is not always financially advantageous to the employer to ensure that the coverage offered is affordable to ALL full-time employees. Employers should consider the §4980H(b) penalty of approximately $340/month for a full-time employee receiving a subsidy. The employer contribution for employees who enroll in the employer’s plan may be more than the employer would be required to pay as a penalty under §4980H(b).

Furthermore, the §4980H(b) penalty applies only for those full-time employees who waive employer-sponsored coverage AND enroll in subsidized coverage through a public Exchange (qualify for a premium tax credit). Therefore, if an employee voluntarily enrolls in unaffordable employer-sponsored coverage or does not qualify for a tax subsidy toward coverage through a public Exchange after waiving the employer’s coverage, the employer will not face a penalty. Keep in mind, employees who are eligible for Medicare or Medicaid will not qualify for a tax subsidy.

Additionally, it is important to understand that there is nothing under the §4980H rules that requires a uniform contribution rate across all categories of employees; rather, affordability is considered on an employee-by-employee basis. The employer could choose to contribute differently to different categories of employees or based on a percentage of salary. However, anytime the employer sets different contribution rates for different categories of employees, nondiscrimination rules, which restrict the ability to offer favor highly compensated individuals on a tax-favored basis, must be considered.

Summary

When applicable large employers set employer contributions for health coverage, there are many variables that may affect the strategy chosen. The IRS has simplified things a bit by allowing employers to use one of three employer affordability safe harbors as opposed to having to guess at an employee’s household income. Employers also need to consider how other benefits and incentives offered may affect the employee contribution amount for purposes of calculating affordability. Finally, it is important to weigh the risk of a potential penalty under §4980H(b) for some employees versus choosing to set the employer contribution at a higher rate for lower paid employees.

 

---

EPIC Employee Benefits Compliance Services

For further information on this or any other topics, please contact your EPIC consulting team.

Learn About Our Employee Benefits Compliance Services

EPIC offers this material for general information only. EPIC does not intend this material to be, nor may any person receiving this information construe or rely on this material as, tax or legal advice. The matters addressed in this document and any related discussions or correspondence should be reviewed and discussed with legal counsel prior to acting or relying on these materials.

DOWNLOADABLE RESOURCES

COMPLIANCE ALERT (PDF)